Gender-Based Notions of Homoerotic Love: Sappho and Plato’s Symposium

Gender-Based Notions of Homoerotic Love Sappho and Platos Symposium The poetry of Sappho, and the speeches in Platos Symposium both deal primarily with homoerotic love, although Sappho, one of the only fe potent poets in Ancient Greece, speaks from the fe antheral perspective, opus Platos work focuses on the nature of this love between men. thither are several fundamental component parts that are common to both perspectives, including correspondent ideals of youth and beauty, and the idea of rely as integral to both views on love. Despite these similarities, however, there is an important distinction, which can be understood in terms of Pausanias concepts of Common versus Celestial Love, where Sapphos view represents Common Love, and the big view of Symposium represents Celestial Love. While Sapphos work is very such(prenominal) grounded in the physical realm, Plato emphasizes that true love is centralized in the mind, and that it is an clever an d philosophical phenomenon. Pausanias, who delivers Symposiums second speech, explains some of the societal norms governing male homoerotic affairs. The rules by which a sports fan (an older man) and his boyfriend (a raw man who has probably non yet grown his beard) may carry are rigid, and strongly enforced by the societys honourable code. Pausanias reveals that the convention of this relationship is pursuer/pursued our society encourages the lovers to chase their boyfriends, and their boyfriends to pull out away this enables us to find out whether a given lover and his beloved are good or bad (184a). Pausanias emphasizes the moral element further when he discusses the circumstances under which it is acceptable to gratify a lover. It is acceptable when the ... ...otional) need of a lover. Sappho, who represents female homoeroticism, and Plato, whos Symposium addresses many aspects of male homoerotic love, share some fundamental aspects of love, but the ir views and objectives are mostly different. The latters goal is essentially intellectual satisfaction, while the occasions is more directly linked with physical beauty and desire for physical closeness, not characterized by grand moral and intellectual ideals. This is not to say that the love between Sappho and her lovers, was solely based on cozy desire. It is certainly wrong to assume that, in light of the Symposiums perspective, they were mindless, sex-driven lesbians. I would argue, rather, that this love, is more real, more common, and more universally accessible, whereas the love in Symposium is exceedingly specialized, and accessible exclusively to men.