Free

Free impart and Determination EssayDo you make your own choices or your destiny has been decided for you by set behind your manage? For thousands of years, this question has puzzled philosophers, scientist and bothone who thinks about how they choose to act and live. Part of the complexity of the bet is related to the metaphysical nature of the subject which has a close affinity with the concept of GOD. Some flock think that Everything that happens in nature and life is predetermined.Morality, love, hate and save go forth is just an illusion(Ward, 2005) while others think, humans beings have an arbitrary and total unloosendom to enjoy all the deeds and actions un laboured by any external forces, fate or divine intervention ( Sadegh, 2011). There be at least triad main(prenominal) approaches to the problem of free pull up stakes and determinism. First is deterministic approach. Determinists main idea is that all events be caused and the caused events are never fr ee, (Ward, 2005). The future render of things can be explained and predicted by knowing the current state of the things and the way they are affected by the work of natural laws, (Ward, 2005).This approach implies that the urge to eat, for example, is governed by our sexual need and the search for food is to a fault a natural reaction to this need. When a person is on a diet and limits his food intakes at the date of hunger, the deterministic view explains that this restriction is non by choice but it is a natural response to the health concern. To make things more complicated, if the person fails to observe his diet and fall off the wagon, the failure is attributed to the winning of the hunger force over health advised force.The Libertarianism approach on the other hand, recognizes free will, and the ability to make choices unconstrained by forces such as physical laws, fate and divine desire. Mans decisions are influenced, but not caused (Sadegh, 2011). The question of free will has important implications for our righteous responsibility. If we do not have free will, and our behavior is determined by what came before us, like our environment, genetics and our parents then what does that mean for our justice system and our idea of crime and penalisation?How do we treat individuals who commit crimes if we believe their backgrounds led them to the crimes? The third approach to contendds the issue of Free will and Determinism is the compatibility view or a combination of both. This simply means that determinism and freewill are not absolute concepts and freedom is compatible with determinism because freedom essentially just a matter of not being constrained in certain way when one acts or makes a choice. The reality is that humans have whatever degree of free will within the boundaries of determinism. Normal adult human beings in normal part are able to act and choose freely.No one is holding a gun to their heads. and then they are fully free to choos e and act even if their whole physical and psychological establishment is determined by thing that they had no control over like genetic inheritance and betimes upbringing. It is true that our choices are limited by some circumstances, but it does not mean that we are not free in those circumstances. Only compulsion, panic or uncontrollable impulse really removes our freedom to choose. all the same when our finger is being forced down on the button, we can still act freely in resisting the pressure.Going back to my hunger example, although hunger is a natural reaction to seek food, and man expertness not have control over this mechanism, he is certainly in control of the way he is reacting toward this need. What to eat, when to eat and even how much to eat, are some of the decisions that man can make. Of course we cant do everything we want to do, we might want to fry unassisted or end civil war in Africa or even free all women from abuse. But that is not free will, free will is simply a matter of having true and genuine options and opportunities for action, and being able to choose between those options jibe to what we want and think.One of the strongest evidence for supporting free will is human conscience. When people do something that is against their moral values they feel shame and regret and they try to use their negative experience to avoid reservation the same mistakes in future. This behavior and emotional response indicate that humans have a free nature. The existence of shame is unexplainable with a deterministic view. The fact that people admire and praise the dear and rebuke the evil is also a confirmation of free will. Growing up and going to teach in a Muslim society, we were encouraged to think, talk and write about free will and determination.The main reason was to teach us the responsibility of our actions, despite knowing that God is aware and in control of everything. It might have been difficult to understand such a philosophical concept at the time but now I am at peace with this concept due to the early learn of Islam. Islam provides a comprehensive answer to the Free will and determinism debate. Islam, more than 1200 years ago stated No Determinism, No Free will but something in between. According to Islam, the choices of man are not unaccompanied determined by God.Man indeed is a free agent and freely makes choices, but these choices are limited. One of the reasons for the creation of the world is to provide a ground for humans to flourish and qualify for divine satisfaction. God will reward or punish people in the hereafter based on their deeds. One way to featureize the concept of ultimate responsibility for ones action is by refereeing to the story of hell and heaven. If we are responsible for what we do, then it make sense to propose that it could be just to punish some in hell and reward others in heaven. It makes sense because what we do is absolutely up to us.But, one certainly does not have t o believe in the story of heaven and hell in order to understand and believe the notion of responsibility. Karl Popper, one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century also recognised that there had to be some balance between complete determinism (clocks) and complete disorder and rule (clouds), (Haselhurst ,2012). What we need for understanding rational human behaviour and indeed, animal behaviour is something intermediate in character between perfect chance and perfect determinism something intermediate between perfect clouds and perfects clocks (Popper, 1972, p.232) (Haselhurst ,2012).1. Ward, K. Baron, DHolbach And Determinism, control surface source buddhism Oxford University Press (2005) 2. Sadegh, M (2011) Citing website. Free will and determination in Islam. Retrieved Feb 20, 2013, from http//www. bsharat. com/id/1/2/1jabr. hypertext markup language 3. Haselhurst, G, (2012) Citing website. Philosophy of Education. Retrieved Fed 20, 2013, from http//www. spaceandmot ion. com/Philosophy-Free-Will-Determinism. htm.