Modern American History Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Modern Ameri screw History - Essay ExampleThus, the advent of nuclear weapons has created cardinal difficulties to the very spirit of adult democracy and the tension between nuclear weapons secrecy and the values of liberal democracy is not new now. During the Cold War, the U.S. intelligence community had maintained maddening level of secrecy, in particular on matters of defense and to question it was to run the risk of macrocosm accused of lack of patriotism, which became the defense apparatus of the McCarthy era. Is it any different now Can we anymore defend our human rights without appearing to be being for the terroristsThe answer lies somewhere else. Since Machiavelli, secrecy has been seen as a way of the Republic, which must exercise bureaucratic world power by governing through such means that must not be concealed. Such interest is the first step towards attaining a stronghold into affairs that is free of public scrutiny and thus becomes rigid, ratified and powerful. The present state has become a panopticon who must gaze into the public and private affairs of its flock with distinct mistrust and hence raise an air of constant alarm. Woodrow Wilsons Woodrow anti-secrecy assertion during the 1912-election campaign held the view that presidency ought to be all outside and no inside, he said, and there ought to be no place where anything can be done that everybody does not know aboutcorruption thrives in secret places, and we believe it a fair supposal that secrecy means impropriety.1 However, what actually tilted the balance beam towards governmental secrecy were the atomic Energy Act of 1946 and the National Security Act of 1947 just during the Cold War era, which established this unflinching requirement for secrecy beyond the publics eye and beyond their acquiescence. Political theorist Robert Dahl observes this phenomenon of a jerky urge for nuclear secrecy and comments that such requirements are a tragic paradox since these decisions ha ve more often than not escaped the control of democratic process.2 Secrecy and its norms have largely become effectively supreme after September 11. The whole world has really changed forever but not for good. The government damage this as moral obligation to protect secret and balance it constantly against the publics right to access in a culture of openness. Thus is the question is not secrecy oppressive On the contrary, even in the face of such turbulence one can draw the example of the European Convention of human beings Rights. The Rights of people, as per ECHR (European Convention of Human Rights) are put above the rights of states out of a realization, borne out of common reality, that states acted in self-interest to the detriment of humanity throughout history. From time immemorial, the concept of States always shares a feel of being threatened (especially superpowers like us Americans) a cause and effect relation of dominating and nerve-wracking to offer resistance. It is generally believed that though there are peaceful and controlled environments existing within states, the international theatre is anarchical and prone to uncontrollable violence. What these motifs do is put the focus of national security on the apology of ones territorial boundaries and sovereignty. Power comes to be measured through military capability, where everybody starts sharing a sense of being marginalized. The world begins to have an absurd dynamism and begins to operate on a zero-sum game in which, harmonise to